Thursday, June 9, 2011

Possessive of experience in Darai

Himalayan languages code experiencers in two broad areal patterns (Bickel 2004). The most common across the Indo-European languages is experiencer-goal or Dative subject construction, which is already discussed in the 2.2.1 of this paper. In the Himalayas, it is universal in the Indo-Aryan languages, but has also spread into adjacent Tibeto-Burman languages (and in to Burushaski; Bashir 1985). It is vigorously attested in the Newar and the Kiranti languages of Eastern Nepal, and also in the western Tibetan language Balti (Bickel 2004). Apart from Dative subject construction, in the Northeastern part of the Indic subcontinent, occur the Experiencers-possessor constructions, which spread all over South-East Asia (including Myo-Yao, Mon Khmer, and Tai-Kadai languages). It is widely found in the Kiranti languages, but apart from few examples in Newar it is not a common feature of other Himalayan Tibeto-Burman languages. In Indo-Aryan, except for Maithili (Yadava 1996) and Marathi in the majority of South Asian Indo-Aryan languages, a verb does not agree across a postposition (Kachru, 1980). However, the recent research shows that in Darai a verb agrees with the possessor typically in comparative situation of the Dative Subject construction, which is sometime termed as ‘Possessive of experience’ or ‘Experiences-possessor’. Such constructions recapitulate the pan-Southeast Asian theme of what Matisoff (1986) calls psycho-collocations or haplologized, psychollocations. Among Indo-Aryan languages, it is also found to some extent in Assamese, Bangla and Oriya adjacent to the Tibeto-Burman world (Bickel 2004).

These examples (27-32) show that the possessive subject agrees with the verb.

(27) me-r peT bota-im

1s-POSS stomach hurt-1s

'I have a stomach ache.'

(28) te-r peT bota-ir

2s-POSS stomach hurt-2s

'You have a stomach ache.'


(29) ik-r peT bota-ik

3s-POSS stomach hurt-3s

'He has a stomach ache.'


(30) ham-r peT bota-it

1p-POSS stomach hurt-1p

'We have a stomach ache.'


(31) teu-r peT bota-iu

2p-POSS stomach hurt-2p

'You (pl) have a stomach ache.'


(32) onen-k peT bota-ikan

3p-POSS stomach hurt-3p

'They have a stomach ache.'

Sunday, May 29, 2011

The Darai Language Typology

Darai is a verb final language. Topics normally occur in the initial position. The dominant unmarked word order of the major constituents of the sentence is SOV. It is a nominative/ accusative language rather than an ergative/ absolutive language. It shows SOV, GN, AN, NREL, V AUX order. It is a suffixing language.

The following isolated sentence exemplifies unmarked word order, e.g.,

mi bat ki-t-m

1s rice eat-NPST-1s

S O V

'I eat rice.'

Darai is a head-marking language where the core arguments are obligatorily marked on the verb; possession is marked on the possessed. Like other South Asian languages, there is no preference in the order of nominal elements.

A typological survey of Darai shows that its phonology and the nominal morphology follow the patterns of other Indo-Aryan languages of South-Asia. But the inflectional morphology and the agreement patterns in the syntax distinguish Darai from other languages of the same family. It is amazing that the agreement pattern based on person hierarchy of Darai is not only different from Nepali and Hindi but also it is completely different from Bote, Kumal (Gautam 2000, Parajuli 2000), Danuwar (Bhandari 2001), Majhi languages which are the close sister languages of Darai. In terms of inflectional morphology and syntactic relations, Darai shares some features of Tibeto-Burman languages.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

The Darai People and Their Language


The Darai (ISO 639-3: dry) language is spoken primarily in the inner Terai and the western hill area of the Tanahun, Paalpa and Gorkha districts of Nepal. Tanahun has relatively large village clusters consisting of numerous hamlets in the foothills and on the banks of Madi and Narayani river. It stretches over the whole ridge of mid-western mountains to the border of Gorkha, Palpa, Chitwan and Nawalparasi districts. Darais also recently settled on the plains of Chitwan district. The social situation contributes to the fact that Darai is increasingly being supplanted by Nepali and Tharu languages. The variety of the Darai language spoken in Chitwan is different from Pipaltar (Tanahun) and Damauli; so there are already three dialects of Darai (viz. Chitwan, Damauli and Tanahu) identified in my previous research (ref. Paudyal 2003). At a purely lexical level, based on cognate counts from the Swadesh 100 word list, the similarity between the major branches of Darai is about 50 to 60 %; which exhibits a high level of intelligibility between them. The count between Chitwan and Damauli, for example, is 57 %. Intelligibility between Chitwan and Pipaltar is lower in comparison to Chitwan and Damauli (Paudyal 2003). All three names of the dialects are exonyms, and the speakers themselves, regardless of their dialect, refer to their language simply as Darai Kura (Kura is a Nepali term for ‘language’). This is the language Grierson (1909) calls Darhi and Dahi and Hodgson (1874) calls Dadhi. The complex ethnic and historical interrelationship makes a study of this language especially interesting. The special nature of the language implies that a grammar of Darai would be of great interest in our understanding of the effects of language contact and borrowing.

Physically Darais look like Tibeto-Burman people. But linguistically they speak Indo-Aryan language belonging to the Indo-European family. A genealogical development route of Indo-Aryan languages shows that Old Indo-Aryan languages (OIA) split into several Middle Indo-Aryan (MIA) dialects; among them the most popular were Maharashtri Prakrit, Sauraseni Prakrit and Magadhi (Jain 2003) and Ardhamagadhi Prakrit. Darai along with other languages, such as Bote, Majhi, Danuwar, Tharu2, Kumal, Bengali, Oriya, Asamese, Magahi, Bhojpuri, Maithili form a linguistic group. Their source is the Ardhamagadhi Prakrit or Eastern Prakrit, which was brought to this area from Magadh. Lassen (in Clark 1924) tried to prove that the Prakrit dialect spoken in the Prabodhacandrodaya by the Digambara Jain monk, by the pupil of the Carvaka, and by the messenger from Orissa is Ardhamagadhi. Bhattacharya (1993) notes that Magadhi was the spoken language of eastern India, which was inhabited by large numbers of fishermen. He summarizes that Magadhi has some strong phonetic similarities to Tibeto-Burman languages which scholars think are due to its close contact with Non-Aryan languages. It is true that Darai people were also prominently boatmen and fishermen, but instead of phonetic and phonological features, the syntactic and morphological features of Darai are similar to Non-Aryan languages, particularly to Dravidian and Tibeto-Burman languages.

Darai is on the verge of extinction. Though the number of Darai population recorded is 10,210 (CBS report 2001), there are barely 1000 active speakers of this language. If nothing happens it is likely that the current or the next generation will be the last one to speak Darai. This language does not have its own written tradition (they use the Devanagari script), and it will definitely vanish within a very short period of time. The reasons for the decline in the use of Darai are many and varied. Prominent among them is undoubtedly the one-nation-one-language policy of the Nepalese state in the past. At present people are increasingly aware of the need for language preservation and promotion, but without a supportive language policy by the state, and support from the government, most languages are doomed to die. Nepali as the national, official language is being used extensively in administration, education, the media and so on, and therefore speakers of other languages have no choice but to use their language less and Nepali more. As opportunities for using their own languages decrease, the younger generation tends to use more Nepali, thus losing their language loyalty. Nepali has been a “killer’’ language to most of the minority languages in the country.

Other factors are migration, education and inter-caste marriage. During my fieldwork on Darai in 2003 I noticed that the Chitwan and Damauli dialects of Darai are already heavily influenced by Nepali, Tharu and Gurung languages. However, the Pipaltar dialect of Darai remains less influenced by other languages.

Darai religion is highly syncretic and in many respects does not conform to orthodox Hinduism. For example, worshipping ancestors and nature (eg. sansari devi), offering and consuming alcoholic drinks (local beer), and shamanic healing are part and parcel of their religion.

Netra Prasad Paudyal
University of Leipzig & Tribhuvan University